References

Research methods

  1. Proctor E et al. Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65–76 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20957426/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  2. LeFevre AE, Dane P, Copley CJ, et al. Unpacking the performance of a mobile health information messaging program for mothers (MomConnect) in South Africa: evidence on program reach and messaging exposure. BMJ Global Health 2018;3:e000583 (https://gh.bmj.com/content/3/Suppl_2/e000583, accessed 16 November 2020).
  3. Sumari-de Boer M et al. Implementation and effectiveness of evriMED with short messages service (SMS) reminders and tailored feedback compared to standard care on adherence to treatment among tuberculosis patients in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: proposal for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):426 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31300028/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  4. Muuraiskangas S, Harjumaa M, Kaipainen K, Ermes M. Process and Effects Evaluation of a Digital Mental Health Intervention Targeted at Improving Occupational Well-Being: Lessons From an Intervention Study With Failed Adoption. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 May 11;3(2):e13 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27170553/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  5. Maraba N, Hoffmann CJ, Chihota VN, Chang LW, Ismail N, Candy S, et al. Using mHealth to improve tuberculosis case identification and treatment initiation in South Africa: Results from a pilot study. PLoS ONE. (2018);13(7): e0199687.
  6. abeta P et al. Feasibility of the TBDx automated digital microscopy system for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0173092 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28253302/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  7. Belknap R, Weis S, Brookens A, Au-Yeung KY, Moon G, DiCarlo L, Reves R. Feasibility of an ingestible sensor-based system for monitoring adherence to tuberculosis therapy. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53373 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23308203/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  8. Konduri N, Sawyer K and Nizova N. User experience analysis of e-TB Manager, a nationwide electronic tuberculosis recording and reporting system in Ukraine. ERJ open research. 2017;3(2), 00002–2017 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429022/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  9. Measures for implementation research [website]. Lebanon: Center for Technology and Behavioral Health/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (https://www.c4tbh.org/resources/measures-for-implementation-studies/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  10. Grid-enabled measures database [website]. (https://www.gem-measures.org/Public/Home.aspx, accessed 16 November 2020).
  11. Measuring the use of the RE-AIM model dimension items: checklist. Steering Committee for National Working Group on RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework (https://www.re-aim.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/checklistdimensions.pdf, accessed 16 November 2020).
  12. Measures and checklists: RE-AIM Framework. Steering Committee for National Working Group on RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework (https://www.re-aim.org/resources-and-tools/measures-and-checklists/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  13. Wave 6 Digital Adherence Technology Projects [website]. Geneva: Stop-TB Partnership (http://www.stoptb.org/global/awards/tbreach/wave6dat.asp; accessed 16 November 2020).
  14. Adapted from: Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions: A practical guide to conducting research and assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252183/9789241511766-eng.pdf?sequence=1).
  15. Costing tool for DAT projects. Geneva: Stop TB Partnership (http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/global/awards/tbreach/DAT%20costing%20tool_V2.pdf, accessed 16 November 2020).
  16. Training course on ethics in implementation research. Geneva: Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases/World Health Organization; 2019 (https://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2019/ethics-in-ir-course/en/, accessed 16 November 2020).
  17. Guidelines on submitting research proposals for ethics review. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/groups/research-ethics-review-committee/guidelines-on-submitting-research-proposals-for-ethics-review, accessed 16 November 2020).
  18. Research Ethics Review Committee: Templates for informed consent forms [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/groups/research-ethics-review-committee/guidelines-on-submitting-research-proposals-for-ethics-review/templates-for-informed-consent-forms, accessed 16 November 2020).
  19. Statement of guiding principles for ethics in digital health. Adapted from the Seminar on Ethics in Digital Health convened in July and November 2018. Palo Alto (CA): Stanford University (https://library.stanford.edu/digitalhealthethics/guiding-principles).
  20. Distefano M and Schmidt H. mHealth for TB treatment adherence: a framework to guide ethical planning, implementation and evaluation. Global Health Science Practice, 2016: 4 (2): 211–221 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982246/, accessed 16 November 2020).